Raul E. Torres

Raul E. Torres

Raul E. Torres
Badge #5101, Hispanic Male, 36
Detective Grade 3 at Queens Special Victims Squad since October 2022, active
Also served at 81st Precinct
Service started January 2015, made $128,000 last year, Tax #958127

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Nonlethal restraining device (4)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises (2)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26359
Closed: 11/17/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
13 Allegations
7 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
4 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
4 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202003690, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201900826, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201507260, August 2015
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202003690, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201900826, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Female, 39 Exonerated
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201507260, August 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 27 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force White Female, 27 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26359
Closed: 11/17/2022
Case Details:
  1. Deployed a taser outside Department guidelines.
  2. Wrongful entry of a premises.
  3. Wrongful seizure of a person's property.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Patterson, Kahlil vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 516997/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, July 20, 2021

Other Documents