Reuben Antwi

Badge #155, Black Male, 37
Sergeant at 32nd Precinct since August 2022, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx, 47th Precinct, 83rd Precinct
Service started July 2009, made $124,000 last year, Tax #948300

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Discourtesy: Word (3)


Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202306738, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202006162, September 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, April 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201405227, May 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201015176, October 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202306738, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202006162, September 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Age 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Age 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Age 40-44 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word White, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Age 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, April 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201405227, May 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 22 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Black Male, 19 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201015176, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 33 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 33 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25608
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to obtain medical treatment.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2017-18247
Employment History Summary
Closed: 4/24/2018
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Did knowingly associate with persons or organizations reasonably believed to be engaged in, likely to engage in, or to have engaged in criminal activities.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Engaged in a romantic relationship with a person known to the Department after placing her under arrest and during the pendency of her criminal matter.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)


Other Documents

IAB Investigation
Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter
NYPD Trial Decision 11/27/2019