Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Cheatham, Alexander vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV02191,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 22, 2015, ended May 26, 2016
$5,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff and his friends were in front of their friend's house when defendant officer approached, noticed an empty beer can in their vicinity, and said they would give everyone open container summonses. When Plaintiff questioned them, he was handcuffed, brought to the 83 Precinct, and charged with Dis Con, Resisting Arrest, OGA, and unlawful possession of marijuana, which were ACD'd.