James A. Drummy

Badge #8979, White Male, 40
Police Officer at 101st Precinct since May 2021, active
Also served at 44th Precinct, 110th Precinct
Service started July 2006, made $114,000 last year, Tax #941204

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Other (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28567
Closed: 9/23/2023
Case: 2016-15437
Closed: 7/29/2016

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
5 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Exonerated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202202293, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, August 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202106665, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201904833, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201101692, February 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Asian Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Asian Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Asian Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202202293, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Other Hispanic Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, August 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #202106665, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201904833, April 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Female, 54 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201101692, February 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Asian Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Abuse of Authority: Stop Asian Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Asian Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28567
Closed: 9/23/2023
Case Details:
  1. 01..wrongfully disseminated confidential Department information.
  2. Wrongfully disseminated confidential Department information.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2016-15437
Closed: 7/29/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty wrongfully made false and misleading statements during an official investigation.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty wrongfully and without just cause prevented or interfered with an official Department investigation.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (30 days)