Stephen F. Muhlenbruck

Badge #31867, White Male

Former Police Officer at 103rd Precinct

Service started March 2000, ended March 2023, Tax #925793

Complaints

2 Complaints

7 Allegations

0 Substantiated

2 Exonerated

1 Unfounded

4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200818461, December 2008

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Black Male, 54
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 54
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant:	Black Male, 54
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200505123, May 2005

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200818461, December 2008
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched		Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word	Black Male, 54	Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 54	Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Black Male, 54	Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200505123, May 2005
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Black Male, 34	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Black Male, 34	Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Black Male, 34	Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.