Rory J. Oneill
Badge #1819,
White Male
Also served at
105th Precinct
Service
started January 2015,
made $158,000 last year,
Tax #957921
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
2
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Unfounded
Complaint #202004380,
May 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #201807560,
July 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 26 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #201803977,
May 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202004380, May 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 21-24 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201807560, July 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 26 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201803977, May 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Black Male, 29 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Male, 29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Murphy, T-Jai vs P.O. Winters, Kevin, et al.Case # 18CV05954, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 9, 2018, ended April 4, 2019
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On May 10, 2018, Plaintiff Murphy was on a street corner. Three unnamed police officers interacted with him, and there was a fraudulent traffic ticket declaring defective headlights. However, one of the officers verified that no defective headlight existed on his car. These officers engaged in deceptive practices which led to a nonconsensual search of Plaintiff Murphy’s vehicle. The officers then engaged in conversion of Plaintiff Murphy’s property and he was injured.