Rahul Sahni

Lieutenant at 67th Precinct since November 2022, active
Also served at 83rd Precinct, 108th Precinct
Service started July 2010, made $209,000 last year, Tax #949601
Asian Male

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24362
Closed: 5/31/2022
Case: 2020-22819
Closed: 3/25/2021

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Unavailable
3 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202102773, April 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201502015, March 2015
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201406863, June 2014
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201405203, May 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202102773, April 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201502015, March 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 39 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201406863, June 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 49 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201405203, May 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Female Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Action Female Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24362
Closed: 5/31/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failure to remain on post.
  2. Failure to supervise.
  3. Fraternized with subordinates
  4. Meal in excess of one hour.
  5. Omitted activity log entries.
Penalty: C - Command Discipline, vacation days (18 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - C

Case: 2020-22819
Closed: 3/25/2021
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Violated paid detail rules.
  2. Guilty: Failed to make required entries in Department command log.
  3. Guilty: Made or caused to be made false or inaccurate entries in Department records.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Hassan, Eslam vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 712975/2023, Supreme Court - Queens, June 23, 2023

Sulph, Qudirro vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV03747, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 14, 2015, ended January 2, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On August 4, 2012, Plaintiff Qudirro Sulph drove a friend to Brooklyn in his mother’s 1999 Dodge Caravan, in which he rear-ended the car of an MTA employee at the intersection of Dekalb/Irving Avenues, but left no damage. Police Officers Rahul Sahni and Kimberley Huacon then unlawfully seized, searched, frisked, and arrested Plaintiff and his passenger, charging them with four counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance found in the car. Defendants Huacon and Sahni based their seizure of Plaintiff’s person on a falsely alleged failure to produce a driver’s license and registration for the 1999 Caravan vehicle. Plaintiff cooperated at all times, stating that he had no knowledge of the drugs found in ...