David T. Fitchik

Badge #16674, White Male, 33
Police Officer at 100th Precinct Detective Squad since July 2022
Also served in: 113th Precinct
Service started January 2015, made $117,000 last year, active

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property

Complaints

13 Allegations
1 Substantiated
4 Complaints
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Exonerated
9 Unsubstantiated

February 2019 Complaint
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

January 2019 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

November 2018 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
Penalty: Command Discipline B 5 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

October 2018 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Female, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

February 2019 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 33 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
January 2019 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
November 2018 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 26 Exonerated
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
Penalty: Command Discipline B 5 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
October 2018 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Female, 40 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Isaacs, Andrew vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 722548/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, February 14, 2022