Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $353,501 total settlements.
Morales, Edwin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV05412,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 8, 2017, ended June 1, 2018
$15,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff observed NYPD officers verbally harassing and physically abusing members of a family that had been operating a fruit stand during a festival in Sunset Park. Plaintiff went to observe the altercation when Defendant officers pushed him, and handcuffed him. Plaintiff was charged with New York Penal Law ß 195.05, Obstructing Governmental Administration in the Second Degree; New York Penal Law ß 205.30, Resisting Arrest, New York Penal Law ß 240.26, Harassment in the Second Degree, and New York Penal Law ß 240.20, Disorderly Conduct, which were all later dismissed.
Daza, Jonathan, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV04778,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 18, 2015, ended September 21, 2017
$173,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers approached all three Plaintiffs cursing and yelling while they were packing up their fruit stand. Officers then threw one of the Plaintiffs to the ground and assaulted him while other officers grabbed and struck the other two Plaintiffs. Plaintiff 1 was charged with 205.30, 240.26, and 240.20. Plaintiff 2 was charged with 120.05, 120.00, 205.30, 195.05, 240.26, and 240.20. Plaintiff 3 was charged with 205.30, 195.05, and 240.20. All charges against all Plaintiffs were eventually dismissed
Del Rosario, Enrique vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV02139,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 21, 2015, ended May 31, 2016
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers severely assaulted Plaintiff for holding a video camera, stole the video camera, and charged him with 120.05, Attempted Assault in the Second Degree, ß 155.30 Attempted Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, 120.00 Attempted Assault in the Third Degree, ß 155.25 Attempted Petit Larceny, and ß 240.20 Disorderly Conduct, which resulted in an ACD
Adjei, Alfonso vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 506862/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 13, 2014, ended February 27, 2019
$125,000 Settlement