James Fenko

Badge #1924, White Male
Sergeant at 122nd Precinct since September 2019, active
Service started July 2012, made $137,000 last year, Tax #952723

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
5 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300465, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202203952, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201902075, February 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201900111, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Asian Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202300465, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202203952, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201902075, February 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201900111, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Asian Male, 44 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Crespo, Jennifer, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV02693, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 7, 2022
Complaint
Description: On May 9, 2019, Plaintiffs Angel and Mayra Crespo had a domestic dispute while their children, Plaintiffs Amy and Jennifer Crespo, were also home. After the dispute, Angel Crespo drove away from the family home but later returned to grab belongings. While Angel Crespo was driving, Mayra Crespo called 911. Police Officers (Defendants P.O. Bove, P.O. Ieraci, P.O. Cullen, P.O. Pirozzi, and P.O. Does) Arrived at the house after Angel Crespo returned. Mayra and Jennifer Crespo specified to the Defendants that they did not want Angel Crespo arrested. Ignoring the request, Defendant Bove stated, "I want to collar him," and the group of officers illegally entered the home. The officers grabbed and arrested Angel Crespo...

Other Documents

Staten Island DA Disclosure Letter references 'Misclassified Complaint Report/Fail to Prepare a Report'