Jose E. Vargas

Jose E. Vargas

Jose E. Vargas
Badge #5734, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at 122nd Precinct
Also served at FM SEC, Police Service Area 8
Service started July 2004, ended August 2022, Tax #935904

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201900644, January 2019
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201802536, March 2018
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201604740, May 2016
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200803465, October 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201900644, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action White Male, 36 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 36 Complaint Withdrawn
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 36 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201802536, March 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Age 47 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201604740, May 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 20 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200803465, October 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 20 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Crespo, Jennifer, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV02693, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 7, 2022
Complaint
Description: On May 9, 2019, Plaintiffs Angel and Mayra Crespo had a domestic dispute while their children, Plaintiffs Amy and Jennifer Crespo, were also home. After the dispute, Angel Crespo drove away from the family home but later returned to grab belongings. While Angel Crespo was driving, Mayra Crespo called 911. Police Officers (Defendants P.O. Bove, P.O. Ieraci, P.O. Cullen, P.O. Pirozzi, and P.O. Does) Arrived at the house after Angel Crespo returned. Mayra and Jennifer Crespo specified to the Defendants that they did not want Angel Crespo arrested. Ignoring the request, Defendant Bove stated, "I want to collar him," and the group of officers illegally entered the home. The officers grabbed and arrested Angel Crespo...