Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2013-9273
Opened: 3/29/2013
Closed: 2/18/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
White off-duty, operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
-
Guilty:
White off-duty, operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by the consumption of alcohol
-
Guilty:
Refused to submit to a breathalyzer test
-
Guilty:
Unfit for duty
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty (30) pre-trial suspension days, fifteen (15) vacation days, ordered breath testing.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $23,000 total settlements.
Bare, Ramon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157426/2021,
Supreme Court - New York, September 9, 2021
Martinez, Edickson vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157427/2021,
Supreme Court - New York, September 9, 2021
Russell, Horace vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV01733,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 10, 2013, ended December 16, 2013
$23,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 3, 2012 , plaintiff Russell was lawfully present outside his place where he worked at 196 Rockaway Parkway . Plaintiff was unlocking the gate to an alleyway next to the building when Det. Mosquera , P.O. Connell and Det. Jackson approached and arrested plaintiff on narcotics charges despite knowledge that they lacked probable cause .