Kurtis J. Sylvester

Badge #5060, Black Male
Police Officer at Brooklyn Court Section since October 2014, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Queens North Task Force
Service started July 2005, made $136,000 last year, Tax #937824

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201703501, April 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200716893, November 2007
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201703501, April 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200716893, November 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 22 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Higginbotham, Douglas J. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV08549, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 29, 2014, ended November 2, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was on a pole videotaping an arrest during Occupy Wall Street when Defendant Officers pulled his legs out from under him, arrested him, took him to the 1st Precinct, and charged him with Dis Con, which was later dismissed.