Migdalia Ramos

Badge #99, Hispanic Female
Former Detective Grade 3 at Bronx Special Victims Squad
Also served at 49th Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended July 2022, Tax #927854

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Gesture
Offensive Language: Ethnicity

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2019-20600
Closed: 8/7/2019

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201502158, December 2014
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Asian Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Asian Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #200912413, August 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200905543, March 2009
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: White Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201502158, December 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Asian Male, 33 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Gesture Asian Male, 33 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #200912413, August 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 55 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 55 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200905543, March 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray White Male, 31 Exonerated
Force: Physical force White Male, 31 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2019-20600
Closed: 8/7/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Knowingly acted in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen (17) years old.
  2. Guilty: Involved in an off-duty incident, failed to notify the operations unit.
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (15 days), vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits.

Santiago, Gregory vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 302013/2015, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 4, 2015, ended May 29, 2019
Zero Disposition

Shepard v. City of New York et al
Case # 022088/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx
Stipulation

Shepard v. City of New York et al
Case # 022090/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx

Baez v. City of New York et al
Case # 305116/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx
Summons/Complaint