Daniel C. Hill

Badge #4208, White Male, 43
Also served in: 90th Precinct, 19th Precinct
Service started July 2001, made $152,000 last year, active

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Stop


Complaints

5 Allegations
2 Substantiated
3 Complaints
2 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

February 2016 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: White Male, 66
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 66
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

September 2012 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
additional details

February 2005 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 12
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

February 2016 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop White Male, 66 Exonerated
Force: Physical force White Male, 66 Unsubstantiated
additional details
September 2012 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
additional details
February 2005 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 12 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': Also referred to as 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11496
Opened: 3/7/2014
Closed: 5/26/2015
Case Details:
  1. Not Guilty: While on-duty, officer abused his authority in that without just cause stopped an individual known to the Department without sufficient legal authority
  2. Not Guilty: While on-duty, officer abused his authority in that without just cause detained an individual known to the Department without sufficient legal authority
Penalty: Respondent found Not Guilty