Daniel C. Hill

Badge #4208, White Male
Former Sergeant at Deputy Commissioner Management and Budget
Also served at 19th Precinct, 90th Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended January 2023, Tax #928487

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Stop


Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201601093, February 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: White Male, 66
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 66
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201212754, September 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2015
additional details

Complaint #200501552, February 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 12
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201601093, February 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop White Male, 66 Exonerated
Force: Physical force White Male, 66 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201212754, September 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2015
additional details
Complaint #200501552, February 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 12 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11496
Document
Opened: 3/7/2014
Closed: 5/26/2015
Case Details:
  1. Not Guilty: While on-duty, officer abused his authority in that without just cause stopped an individual known to the Department without sufficient legal authority
  2. Not Guilty: While on-duty, officer abused his authority in that without just cause detained an individual known to the Department without sufficient legal authority
Penalty: Respondent found Not Guilty


Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 12/22/2022
NYPD Trial Decision 5/26/2015