Craig J. Potter

Craig J. Potter

Craig J. Potter
Badge #13773, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Critical Response Command since October 2015, active
Also served at 106th Precinct, 100th Precinct
Service started July 2005, made $137,000 last year, Tax #939247

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201308204, July 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201010767, August 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200805194, April 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201308204, July 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 43 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201010767, August 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 20 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200805194, April 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 52 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 52 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 52 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.