Jorge A. Rochez

Badge #2048, Black Male
Former Police Officer at Critical Response Command
Also served at 30th Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended August 2021, Tax #929056

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17262
Closed: 4/25/2017

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
8 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Unavailable
2 Exonerated
4 Unfounded

Complaint #200800544, January 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200702554, October 2006
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200203614, May 2002
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200800544, January 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200702554, October 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 37 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 37 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 37 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Ethnicity Black Male, 37 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200203614, May 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 20 Unfounded
Force: Hit against inanimate object Hispanic Male, 20 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17262
Closed: 4/25/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off duty, having engaged in a dispute with a person known to the Department, said Police Officer wrongfully attempted to prevent her from calling for a police response.
  2. Guilty: While off duty, said Police Officer wrongfully engaged in a physical altercation with a person known to the Department
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (30 days)


Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 11/9/2018