Gerardo A. Perrone

Gerardo A. Perrone

Gerardo A. Perrone
Badge #9752, White Male, 39
Police Officer at OPS Unit since March 2018, active
Also served at 103rd Precinct
Service started July 2006, made $127,000 last year, Tax #942343

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Lawsuit settlements:
$15,000   Grant, Antuan vs Callagy, Eric, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV03157
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201603216, March 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201309924, October 2013
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201108283, June 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201008813, June 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200806462, May 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201603216, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 51 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201309924, October 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Female, 25 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201108283, June 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 44 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force Black Female, 44 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201008813, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 49 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200806462, May 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 18 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 18 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Grant, Antuan vs Callagy, Eric, et al.
Case # 15CV03157, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 2, 2015, ended April 12, 2016
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers approached Plaintiff on the street, stopped and frisked him, handcuffed him, assaulted him, sprayed with Mace and then taken to the 103rd Precinct, where he was strip-searched. Plaintiff was charged with attempted robbery in the first and second degree, assault in the second and third degrees, and resisting arrest, which a grand jury voted no true bill.