Michael Hartman

Michael Hartman

Michael Hartman
Badge #1855, White Male
Also served at 101st Precinct
Service started January 1995, ended July 2020, Tax #914805

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201500699, January 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200717482, December 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
additional details

Complaint #200709836, July 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201500699, January 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 46 Complainant Uncooperative
Offensive Language: Other Black Male, 46 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200717482, December 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 42 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
additional details
Complaint #200709836, July 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 22 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.