David R. Echevarria

Badge #2139, Hispanic Male, 60
Sergeant Detective Squad at Detective Bureau Central Robbery Division since April 2015, active
Also served at Narcotics Division Bronx Central INIT
Service started November 1992, made $208,000 last year, Tax #902754

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201609940, November 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #200003636, May 2000
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9401067, March 1994
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201609940, November 2016
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #200003636, May 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9401067, March 1994
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.