Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2011-4419
Opened: 4/6/2011
Closed: 4/24/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while said member's ability was impaired by the consumption of alcohol
-
Guilty:
While off duty refused to submit to a breathalyzer test
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully consumed an intoxicant to the extent that said member was unfit for duty
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully consumed an intoxicant to the extent that said member was unfit for duty while armed.
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgement is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty (30) pre-trial suspension days, twenty (20) vacation days, ordered breath testing.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $2,000,000 total settlements.
Hall, Barry, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 722094/2022,
Supreme Court - Queens, October 27, 2022
Douglas, Julian and Green, Sahel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 709207/2019,
Supreme Court - Queens, May 31, 2019, ended April 20, 2021
$2,000,000 Settlement