Andrew Pagano

Andrew Pagano

Andrew Pagano
Badge #1895, White Male
Sergeant at Criminal Intelligence Section since March 2024, active
Service started January 2013, made $169,000 last year, Tax #954136

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29034
Closed: 3/14/2024

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$75,000   Walston, Kenneth, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2019 KCSC KCSC 525005/2019
$15,000   Abreu, Ramon vs City of New York, et al., 2018 EDNY EDNY 17CV07145
$12,500   Henry, Da'shun vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV02464
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
21 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
9 Unfounded
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202204254, June 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202203031, May 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202202726, April 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: White Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201807177, August 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201909737, March 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202204254, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202203031, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Hispanic Female, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Female, 50-54 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202202726, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Hispanic Female, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search White Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 21-24 Alleged Victim Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Female, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201807177, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201909737, March 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29034
Closed: 3/14/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $102,500 total settlements.

Perez, Dajhoun vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 503399/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, February 1, 2023

Walston, Kenneth, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 525005/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, December 19, 2019, ended September 19, 2023
$75,000 Settlement

Abreu, Ramon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV07145, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 3, 2018, ended August 18, 2018
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff complied when asked to turn off boom box speaker as Defendant Officers assaulted Plaintiff and attempted to use a Taser on the Plaintiff. Once the Plaintiff was in handcuffs, Defendant Officers sprayed pepper spray into Plaintiff's face and was later taken to the hospital after being shoved into a fence. Defendant Officers claimed that the music was too loud, that the Plaintiff turned music back on after being asked to turn it off, and that Plaintiff resisted arrest.

Henry, Da'shun vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV02464, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 31, 2016, ended April 10, 2017
$12,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was walking down the street with a friend when they were attacked by two men who tried to rob them. When defendant officers arrived on the scene, they pointed their guns at Plaintiff, slammed him to the ground, handcuffed him, and arrested him. All criminal charges filed against Plaintiff were dismissed.

Other Documents