Mario A. Deras

Captain at 106th Precinct since August 2021, active
Also served at 30th Precinct, 25th Precinct
Service started July 2006, made $173,000 last year, Tax #941650
Hispanic Male

Complaints

2 Complaints
3 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201903267, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201009877, July 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201903267, April 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment White Male, 29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201009877, July 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 38 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 38 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Whiting v. The City of New York et al
Case # 16CV00534, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Complaint, Amended Complaint, Second Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant officers approached Plaintiff on the street, tightly handcuffed him, searched him, found prescribed pills, and then arrested him, and took him to the 13th precinct. Officers charged plaintiff with PL 155.25 'Petit larceny', PL 220.03 'Criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree' and PL 165.40 'Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree'. All charges were later dismissed.