Juan C. Carpio

Juan C. Carpio

Juan C. Carpio
Badge #27523, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 90th Precinct since July 2026
Also served at FIFA World Cup, Police Laboratory, Human Resources Division
Service started July 2021, made $77,100 last year, Tax #971860

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 6/28/2024
Case: 1 Allegation
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
12 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
5 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302472, March 2023
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details

Complaint #202208854, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)
additional details

Complaint #202208857, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202201582, March 2022
Allegation: Offensive Language: Religion
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202302472, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender Black Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Female, 25-29 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details
Complaint #202208854, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)
additional details
Complaint #202208857, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202201582, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Religion Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 6/28/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare required reports.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Owens, Della, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 544730/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, April 2, 2026