Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Zurab Bromberg
Badge #14908,
White Male
Also served at
Housing Borough Brooklyn Impact Response Team
Service
started July 2013,
made $121,000 last year,
Tax #955323
Complaints
2
Complaints
8
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
1
Unsubstantiated
4
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202200517,
December 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Religion |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Female, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Female, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Female, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #201605517,
May 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 26 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #202200517, December 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Offensive Language: Religion | Female, 55-59 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Female, 55-59 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 55-59 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 55-59 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) | |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201605517, May 2016 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 26 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-28201
Closed: 6/16/2023
Case Details:
- Wrongful search of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A