Saurabh A. Shah

Badge #17820, Asian Male
Police Officer at Equipment Section since August 2023, active
Also served at Field Training Unit, 100th Precinct, 40th Precinct, Highway Unit 02, 101st Precinct
Service started July 2011, made $118,000 last year, Tax #951238

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
4 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208609, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202302055, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202200600, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201901030, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202208609, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 50-54 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202302055, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Female, 45-49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202200600, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 60-64 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 60-64 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201901030, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 46 Exonerated
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Cerisier, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV03850, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, November 27, 2019, ended July 20, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: In or about November 1998, Dutchess Community College and Dutchess Community College Association, Inc. hired Plaintiff to serve as General Manager of the Association. Plaintiff performed his work in a satisfactory manner and was fully qualified to perform his duties. At no time during his employment did Defendants raise issues about Plaintiff’s performance, nor did Plaintiff engage in any workplace misconduct or breach workplace rules. In or about 1999 or 2000, the Association and College promoted Plaintiff to Executive Director of the Association. In or about June 2014, the College named Ms. Pamela Edington as President of the College. Ms. Edington also served on the Board of Directions and Board of Trustees f...

Other Documents