Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2014-12500
Opened: 2/25/2010
Closed: 11/18/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, refused to provide his name and shield number when requested to do so.
Penalty: Vacation days (1 day)
Case: 2009-973
Opened: 8/21/2009
Closed: 10/25/2011
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Used physical force on an individual known to the Department without police necessity
-
Guilty:
Omitted activity log entries
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty (30) pre-trial suspension days, thirty (30) vacation days.
Case: 2010-1059
Opened: 2/25/2010
Closed: 5/25/2010
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
-
Guilty:
Operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by an intoxicant.
-
Guilty:
Refused to submit to a breathalyzer test.
-
Guilty:
Failed to identify himself as a Member of Service.
-
Guilty:
Unfit for duty.
-
Guilty:
Impeded a Department investigation.
-
Guilty:
Failed to comply with an order.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (30 days)