Daniel R. Jennings

Daniel R. Jennings

Daniel R. Jennings
Badge #2925, White Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at Criminal Intelligence Section
Also served at 110th Precinct
Service started July 2002, ended October 2022, Tax #930416

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2014-11553
Closed: 5/27/2014

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
5 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201214106, November 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, February 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
additional details

Complaint #200715168, October 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 56
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201214106, November 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 25 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 25 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, February 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
additional details
Complaint #200715168, October 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 56 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11553
Closed: 5/27/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, abused his authority as a member of the New York City Police Department in that he frisked a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
Penalty: Vacation days (3 days)


Lawsuits

Cerda, Ruben D., et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV05371, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 22, 2015, ended December 6, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint, Amended Complaint, Second Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers stopped Plaintiffs' car and searched the car and their persons.

Other Documents