Daniel Song

Badge #3592, Asian Male, 39
Detective Grade 3 at Criminal Intelligence Section since June 2023, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Impact Response Team, 109th Precinct, 81st Precinct
Service started July 2008, made $163,000 last year, Tax #947503

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (2)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14477
Closed: 5/18/2016

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
6 Substantiated
6 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201900816, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Age 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201501953, March 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 12 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 2018
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Interview Details
additional details

Complaint #201207715, May 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Instructions, February 2015
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #201204560, March 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201012747, September 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201900816, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Age 29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201501953, March 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 17 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 17 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 17 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 12 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 2018
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Interview Details
additional details
Complaint #201207715, May 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 28 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 28 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 28 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Instructions, February 2015
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #201204560, March 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201012747, September 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14477
Closed: 5/18/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, stopped a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, frisked a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, searched a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)


Other Documents