Patrick M. Venetek

Patrick M. Venetek

Patrick M. Venetek
Badge #10893, White Male, 40
Police Officer at 1st Precinct since May 2023, active
Also served at Brooklyn Court Section
Service started July 2006, made $134,000 last year, Tax #942662

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26536
Closed: 2/28/2023

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202306519, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202200397, January 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202107138, November 2021
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201507511, September 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200717991, December 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 87
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202306519, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 10-14 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202200397, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202107138, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Hispanic Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201507511, September 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other White Male, 23 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200717991, December 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 87 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26536
Closed: 2/28/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make notifications
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Jones Sr., Rafael Arden vs P.O. Holman, John Doe Et. Al
Case # 16CV00556, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 11, 2016
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was at the under-served veterans office when Defendant officers arrived and asked him to get against the wall. Plaintiff began recording and was told he wasn't under arrest. EMS workers then arrived and Plaintiff was handcuffed and brought to the hospital. Plaintiff was asked to sign a consent to treatment form and when he refused he was strapped to a stretcher, injected with a syringe and work up 2 days later. Plaintiff got in touch with his attorney and a judge ruled that he should be released from custody.