Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 8 known lawsuits, $452,500 total settlements.
Suggs, Shameek vs Detective Pitts, Byran, et al.
Case # 519682/2020,
Supreme Court - Kings, November 16, 2020, ended September 27, 2022
$20,000 Settlement
Medina, Steven vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 306005/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 17, 2014, ended September 29, 2015
$35,000 Settlement
Lara, Claribel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 024196/2014E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 15, 2014, ended July 15, 2015
$50,000 Settlement
Mullins, Kevin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 300304/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 5, 2014, ended March 13, 2015
$35,000 Settlement
Summons/Complaint
Espinal, Gyancarlos vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 307411/2013,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 7, 2014, ended May 27, 2014
$37,500 Settlement
Anderson, Sadiki, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 305747/2013,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 3, 2013, ended December 15, 2015
$260,000 Settlement
Complaint
Binda v. City of New York et al
Case # 305570/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx
Complaint
Brantley v. The City of New York et al
Case # 07CV10979,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$15,000 Settlement
Complaints