Dwight A. Martin

Badge #1348, Black Male
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Brooklyn South since July 2017, active
Also served at Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Impact Response Team, 63rd Precinct
Service started January 2008, made $169,000 last year, Tax #945955

Complaints

7 Complaints
13 Allegations
0 Substantiated
7 Exonerated
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201700786, January 2017
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201406111, June 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201306682, July 2013
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: White Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201111598, September 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201108603, June 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: White Male, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201016978, December 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200815922, November 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201700786, January 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other Black Male, 16 Exonerated
Force: Other Black Male, 16 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201406111, June 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 44 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 45 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 45 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 45 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201306682, July 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold White Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged White Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop White Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201111598, September 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201108603, June 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other White Male, 14 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201016978, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Hispanic Male, 30 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200815922, November 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 33 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Forbes, Carl, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV02751, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 2, 2016, ended April 9, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint, First Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs were property managers for 1690 East 52nd Street, which was vacant at the time of arrest. When they arrived at the property to conduct repairs, the door was locked. They got permission to open the door by prying the key box using a screw driver and/or hammer. While they were inside inspecting the property damage, POs Martin and Morris plus 2 more showed up. Plaintiffs tried to explain to the police officers their job as repairmen and their business on the property to repair water damage. Plaintiffs were all arrested when police disregarded their explanation, charges were brought against them and their cases were dismissed.