Kreshnik Bakraqi

Kreshnik Bakraqi

Kreshnik Bakraqi
Lieutenant Commander Detective at 52nd Precinct Detective Squad since February 2022, active
Service started July 2005, made $213,000 last year, Tax #938016
White Male, 42

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000   Delgado et al. v. City of New York et al., BCSC BCSC 307497/2011
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
4 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202006244, August 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 59
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201601701, February 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201400796, January 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200615154, November 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200603094, March 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202006244, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 59 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201601701, February 2016
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201400796, January 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Female, 39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 17 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 26 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200615154, November 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 36 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200603094, March 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Hispanic Male, 43 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.

Quezada, Jose David vs Det. Bakraqi, Kreshnik, et al.
Case # 15CV10105, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 29, 2015, ended September 26, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On January 19, 2013, at approximately 11:24 AM at the opposite of 324 E. Tremont Avenue in the Bronx, Jose David Quezada was arrested for offenses of criminal sale and possession of a controlled substance. Defendant PO Thomas Demkiw stated he observed the plaintiff hand William Davis (who was also arrested) a small object. Defendant Kelvin Glover stated he observed plaintiff have on his person an orange filmy substance and its packaging, believing the substance was crack/cocaine. This led the plaintiff to be wrongfully arrested.

Burrell, Winston vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV02088, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 27, 2013, ended September 17, 2014
Zero Disposition
Complaint

Delgado et al. v. City of New York et al.
Case # 307497/2011, Supreme Court - Bronx
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint