David E. Camhi

Lieutenant Commander Detective at Central Investigation and Research Division since November 2023, active
Service started January 2006, made $227,000 last year, Tax #939965
Hispanic Male

Lawsuit settlements:
$125,000   Nolasco, Willy vs City of New York, et al., 2022 BCSC BCSC 811224/2022E
$25,000   Samuel, William vs City of New York, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 033178/2018E
$45,000   Almestica, Eduardo vs City of New York, et al., 2014 SDNY SDNY 14CV05901
$19,000   Dieng, Alioune vs City of New York, et al., 2013 SDNY SDNY 13CV02079
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
12 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Alleged Victim Unavailable
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Complaint Withdrawn
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202203022, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202104238, July 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202101798, March 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Age 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201900444, January 2019
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201809516, November 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201212612, September 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201013484, September 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202203022, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202104238, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 45-49 Alleged Victim Unavailable
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 45-49 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202101798, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 10-14 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Age 10-14 Unsubstantiated
Force: Restricted Breathing Age 10-14 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Age 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201900444, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 30 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201809516, November 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201212612, September 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 18 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201013484, September 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 11 known lawsuits, $214,000 total settlements.

Williams, Albert vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 23CV01670, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 1, 2023
Complaint
Description: On November 30, 2020, Plaintiff, a Black man, was cornered in his apartment building by an undercover officer who demanded drugs and did not identify himself as law enforcement. Plaintiff tried to run for safety, but the officer chased him out of the building and tackled him to the ground while eight additional plainclothes officers descended from three different directions. Pressing Plaintiff against the pavement with his hands pinned behind his back, the officers, from the Bronx Narcotics Unit, stomped on him and repeatedly punched and kicked him. Then they dragged him to the back of their van and – while calling him “n*****” and “cockroach” – punched him in the groin until he passed out. The Plaintiff was ha...

Maldonado, Jose vs City of New York et al.
Case # 817536/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 24, 2023

Nolasco, Willy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 811224/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 2, 2022, ended April 5, 2023
$125,000 Settlement

Mercado, Samuel et al. vs City of New York et al.
Case # 814604/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 29, 2021

Samuel, William vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 033178/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 29, 2018, ended April 5, 2022
$25,000 Settlement

Rochester, Charles vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 251498/2016, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 2, 2016

Martinez, Rosie vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV00079, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 11, 2016
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was assaulted, choked, and hit by officers at the 107th precinct during an interrogation. Plaintiff requested medical treatment but was denied until she got to Central Booking.

Neal, Christopher vs Wilson, Romaine, et al.
Case # 15CV02822, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 11, 2015, ended October 13, 2018
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
Complaint
Description: On August 20, 2012, plaintiff was walking to a corner store when, without stating that he was an officer, Detective Marrero asked plaintiff if his name was “Cuba” and brandished his weapon. Marrero proceeded to handcuff plaintiff. Plaintiff was told he was being arrested and taken to the 40th Precinct. Plaintiff was charged with several crimes, which were alll dismissed. On November 23, 2012, plaintiff was tending to a wound at his place of residence when Defendant P.O.s Rodriguez, Maldonado, Wilson, Green, Garciarivas, Lt. Camhi, and Sgt. Bones entered Plaintiff's apartment without permission. One of P.O. Rodriguez/Moldano told plaintiff to come with them. When plaintiff said no, Rodriguez and Modlano, with t...

Almestica, Eduardo vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV05901, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 1, 2014, ended December 3, 2015
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint, Docket Report, Memo Endorsement, Stipulation
Description: On November 29, 2011, while plaintiff was detained at the 40th precinct in the Bronx, four defendant officers grabbed him out of his cell, placed his arm in an arm lock behind his back, and pushed him to the ground, causing shoulder pain and two lacerations to his head. While on the ground, one of the officers continued hitting plaintiff. He had to be taken by ambulance to Lincoln Medical Center, where he received pain medication, three facial sutures, and three staples placed in his scalp.

Lindo, Jammal and Edwards, Norman vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 300765/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 21, 2014

Dieng, Alioune vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV02079, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 28, 2013, ended December 12, 2013
$19,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 27, 2012, NYPD Officers Russell Lewis, Clement Krug, Stephen Carey, Donald Sehl, and David Camhi unlawfully stopped and searched Plaintiff. The officers falsely claimed that Plaintiff had been identified as a subject in an act of vandalism and unlawfully arrested Plaintiff. The officers took Plaintiff's phone and charger and accused Plaintiff of having stolen them.