Christopher J. Popovic

Lieutenant Commander Detective at 41st Precinct Detective Squad since September 2021, active
Service started December 1997, made $226,000 last year, Tax #920717
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

5 Complaints
7 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201507306, August 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201210360, August 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, June 2015
Penalty: Formalized Training / Reprimand
additional details

Complaint #201011877, August 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200902058, February 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200707224, May 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201507306, August 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Female, 23 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201210360, August 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 15 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 15 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 15 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, June 2015
Penalty: Formalized Training / Reprimand
additional details
Complaint #201011877, August 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Female, 36 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200902058, February 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200707224, May 2007
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Rowell, Hozie vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV06598, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 26, 2016, ended February 28, 2019
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
Complaint, First Amended Complaint
Description: Because of Plaintiff's complaints against police officers and local leaders, Defendant Officers at his local precinct, PSA 5, swore out a false affidavit to obtain a search warrant of his home. Officers then raided Plaintiff's home in riot gear, refused to allow residents to put on proper clothes, and planted cocaine. Plaintiff was then arrested, brought to PSA 5, and charged with 220.50(2) and 220.03. Charges were later dismissed on speedy trial grounds.

Other Documents