Matthew Borden

Badge #4560, Black Male, 38
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Queens North since July 2012
Also served in: 75th Precinct
Started January 2005, made $146,000 last year, active

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse Of Authority: Frisk
Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Abuse Of Authority: Stop
Abuse Of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Action



Complaints

9 Allegations
5 Substantiated
4 Complaints
5 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated

August 2013 - Complaint Details
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty, penalty: No penalty
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days

January 2012 - Complaint Details
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated

November 2011 - Complaint Details
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative

April 2010 - Complaint Details
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated

August 2013 - Complaint Details
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Abuse Of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 30 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty, penalty: No penalty
Abuse Of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 30 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 30 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Abuse Of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 38 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty, penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
January 2012 - Complaint Details
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 51 Exonerated
Abuse Of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 51 Exonerated
November 2011 - Complaint Details
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse Of Authority: Stop Male, 25 Complainant Uncooperative
April 2010 - Complaint Details
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse Of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD’s own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-12407
Closed: 2/23/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Stopped a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  2. Guilty: Frisked a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  3. Guilty: Was discourteous to a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  4. Guilty: Failed to provide his shield number when requested to do so by a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (7 days)