Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $50,000 total settlements.
Umanah, Imeh vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 714616/2017,
Supreme Court - Queens, February 15, 2018
Summons/Complaint
Adams, Roberta vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV02555,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 8, 2015, ended July 17, 2015
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers kicked in door to Plaintiff's home with a warrant that was directed at Plaintiff's nephew and found contraband only in Plaintiff's nephew's room. Although Plaintiff was only there temporarily to care of her sick mother, Officers arrested her and charged her with 220.16 (1) and 220.09(1), and Officer Katris lied on the complaint. A Grand Jury later returned No True Bill to all charges.
Cush v. Yeung et al
Case # 13CV04827,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Settlement
First Amended Complaint,
Stipulation
Description: Defendant Officers pulled over Plaintiff's car, searched him, arrested him, and charged him with Possession of a Controlled Substance, which was ACD'd