Jack D. Morrison

Former Captain at Narcotics Borough Queens South
Also served at 112th Precinct
Service started September 2000, ended November 2022, Tax #927233
White Male

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-19065
Closed: 6/18/2018

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$20,000   Rutledge, Johnny, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV04436
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
2 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201809612, November 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201108651, July 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201809612, November 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 52 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201108651, July 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 34 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-19065
Closed: 6/18/2018
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, failed to properly safeguard his service firearm
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Rutledge, Johnny, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV04436, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 16, 2021, ended July 3, 2022
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about August 30, 2018, defendant officers broke down the entrance door and stormed into plaintiffs' premises. They immediately handcuffed plaintiffs and placed them in the living room. Plaintiffs complained that the handcuffs were too tight but the officers refused to loosen them. The officers searched plaintiffs and found no contraband. Eventually, they forcibly removed plaintiffs from the premises and transported them to a precinct where they subjected plaintiffs to a visual body cavity search, forcing them to undress, bend over, and squat and cough, while naked. Still no contraband was found. The officers falsely stated to prosecutors that plaintiffs committed crimes. Upon arraignment, the charges agai...