Pavlo V. Dumanovsky
Badge #267,
White Male
Service
started July 2004,
Tax #934560
Other names:
Paul V. Dumanovsky
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #201909874,
October 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201000338,
January 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 28 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #201909874, October 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201000338, January 2010 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 28 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Brandon, Frank vs City of New York, et al.Case # 20CV07784, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 24, 2020, ended July 27, 2023
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On November 19, 2019, plaintiff Frank Brandon was involved in an automobile accident. NYPD officer Tuhin Khan and his partner arrived on the scene. The other driver accused plaintiff of being intoxicated, which plaintiff denied. Khan requested plaintiff take a Breathalyzer test at the precinct, which showed there was no alcohol in plaintiff's system. A third officer stated he believed plaintiff was under the influence of drugs, which plaintiff denied, completing a series of coordination tests without issue. A highway patrol officer then claimed that a black light revealed the presence of a white powder substance on plaintiff's face. Khan then told plaintiff that he was under arrest on suspicion of driving under...