Peter Borisenko

Badge #3265, White Male, 35

Sergeant at Police Service Area 1 since January 2023, active

Also served at Field Training Unit, 70th Precinct

Service started July 2011, made $147,000 last year, Tax #950091

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-18268

Closed: 12/4/2017

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000 Andre, Johnny vs City of New York, et al., 2019 KCSC KCSC 507655/2019
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints

5 Allegations

3 Substantiated

3 Substantiated (Charges)

1 Exonerated

1 Unfounded

Complaint #201802023, March 2018

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant:	American Indian Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

additional details

Complaint #201702505, March 2017

Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion:	APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 11 days
APU Case Status:	Closed: Resolved by plea, May 2019
Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 11 days
Documents:	Complaint Closing Report

additional details

Complaint #201510903, December 2015

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant:	Asian Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

additional details

Complaint #201802023, March 2018
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital	American Indian Female, 25	Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201702505, March 2017
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 15	Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word		Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Black Male, 15	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 11 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, May 2019
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 11 days
Documents:	Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201510903, December 2015
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Asian Male, 31	Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.

Discipline

Case: 2017-18268

Closed: 12/4/2017

Case Details:

Guilty: Wrongfully used physical force to a person known to the Department without police necessity.
Guilty: Abused his authority as a member of the New York City Police Department in that he threatened a person known to the Department and other individuals iwht the use of force without sufficient legal authority.
Guilty: Was discourteous to a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.

Penalty: Vacation days (11 days)

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.

Andre, Johnny vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 507655/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, April 16, 2019, ended January 26, 2021
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 29, 2019, Plaintiff was assaulted and battered by police officers. [no other information was provided in the complaint].

Heines, Annette, et al. vs Police Officer Mccarthy, et al.
Case # 13CV05674, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 16, 2013, ended June 30, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint, Third Amended Complaint
Description: On or about March 13, 2013, Plaintiff 1 was arrested at a subway by PO McCarthy, Boriskin, McCloud, Camille McSam, and John & Jane Does 1-4. When the officers arrested Plaintiff 1, they placed the handcuffs on so tightly that it caused extreme pain. Plaintiff 1 screamed in pain and immediately advised them of her pre-existing hand condition for which she was on several painkillers and had surgery scheduled. Plaintiff 1 repeatedly advised the officers of her pain throughout the ride to the precinct. PO Boriskin laughed at Plaintiff 1’s suffering. Plaintiff 1 was arraigned and went to the hospital around the time of arraignment. Upon arrival at the precinct, Plaintiff 1 called her husband, Plaintiff 2, and when...

Peter Borisenko

Complaints

Conclusion Meanings:

Discipline

Lawsuits

Other Documents