Johanna M. Eskerete

Badge #10602, Hispanic Female
Former Police Officer at Police Service Area 1
Also served at 83rd Precinct
Service started January 2007, ended August 2021, Tax #943807

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-21646
Closed: 4/13/2020
Case: 2019-21090
Closed: 10/30/2019
Case: 2017-17173
Closed: 6/28/2017

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Instructions)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201702247, February 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 57
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201201331, January 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Instructions)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200906562, April 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Female, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201702247, February 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 57 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201201331, January 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 54 Substantiated (Instructions)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200906562, April 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Female, 37 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-21646
Closed: 4/13/2020
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Made misleading statements during an official Department interview.
  2. Guilty: Made misleading statements during an official Department interview. Impeded an investigation..
  3. Guilty: Failed to safeguard a firearm.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), forfeiture of time/leave balances, pre-trial suspension days (62 days), vested-interest retirement

Case: 2019-21090
Closed: 10/30/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Menacing. Wrongfully displayed a firearm..
  2. Guilty: Discharged a firearm outside Department guidelines.
  3. Guilty: Violated firearms maintenance rules.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), forfeiture of time/leave balances, pre-trial suspension days (62 days), vested-interest retirement

Case: 2017-17173
Closed: 6/28/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Improperly classified a reported criminal activity.
  2. Guilty: Failed to make required activity log entries, failed to document her interactions with a person known to the Department, and failed to document her preparation of a report for Lost Property.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Other Documents