Rigoberto Licona

Badge #4128, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Police Service Area 2
Also served at 41st Precinct
Service started January 2007, ended August 2021, Tax #943485

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-19006
Closed: 10/30/2020
Case: 2019-20393
Closed: 10/30/2020

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$15,000   Ramos, Alvin vs City of New York, et al., 2015 BCSC BCSC 302306/2015
$37,500   Alicea, Allani vs City of New York, et al., 2015 BCSC BCSC 301860/2015
$65,000   Grant, Marcel, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2014 BCSC BCSC 024215/2014E
$25,000   Dupoux, Ketel vs City of New York, et al., 2014 BCSC BCSC 301174/2014
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
3 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201400393, November 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201100517, January 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201010648, June 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201400393, November 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201100517, January 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201010648, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-19006
Closed: 10/30/2020
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Made or caused to be made false or inaccurate entries in Department records.
  2. Guilty: Failed to conduct an investigation.
  3. Guilty: Made misleading or inaccurate statements during an official Department interview.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), forfeiture of time/leave balances, suspended w/o pay (30 days), vacation days (30 days), vested-interest retirement

Case: 2019-20393
Closed: 10/30/2020
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Made or caused to be made inaccurate or false entries in Department records.
  2. Guilty: Off post. Misuse of time..
  3. Guilty: Consumed alcohol while on duty.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), forfeiture of time/leave balances, suspended w/o pay (30 days), vacation days (30 days), vested-interest retirement


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $142,500 total settlements.

Mitchell, Virgil vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023232/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 12, 2020

Ramos, Alvin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 302306/2015, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 1, 2015, ended August 4, 2016
$15,000 Settlement

Alicea, Allani vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301860/2015, Supreme Court - Bronx, May 5, 2015, ended June 8, 2016
$37,500 Settlement

Grant, Marcel, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 024215/2014E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 15, 2014, ended March 27, 2015
$65,000 Settlement

Dupoux, Ketel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301174/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 13, 2014, ended June 4, 2018
$25,000 Settlement