Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $95,000 total settlements.
Dupoux, Ketel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301174/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 13, 2014, ended June 4, 2018
$25,000 Settlement
Waring, Taurian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022137/2013E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 18, 2013, ended February 4, 2014
$20,000 Settlement
Mowatt, Richard vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 020476/2013E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 13, 2013, ended February 18, 2014
$10,000 Settlement
Mowatt, Richard vs City of New York, P.O. Contreras, et al.
Case # 020220/2013E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 18, 2013, ended February 11, 2014
$40,000 Settlement