Jose M. Deschamps

Jose M. Deschamps

Jose M. Deschamps
Former Lieutenant at 114th Precinct
Also served at 63rd Precinct, 75th Precinct, Patrol Borough Queens North, 104th Precinct
Service started July 2002, ended October 2024, Tax #931631
Hispanic Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest (2)
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24201
Closed: 1/15/2022
Case: 2 Allegations

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$52,000   Fashakin, Jannet vs City of New York, et al., 2013 EDNY EDNY 13CV05699
View Details

Complaints

12 Complaints
22 Allegations
6 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
6 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202203651, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, July 22, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202201936, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202103377, May 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202102598, December 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202003034, April 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201909664, November 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Female, 62
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201909309, October 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201906062, June 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201903638, April 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201502936, April 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201403590, April 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: White Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, April 15, 2016
Penalty: Command Discipline A / Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #200605171, July 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 62
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202203651, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Hispanic Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest Hispanic Female, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Other Hispanic Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, July 22, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 8 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202201936, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 40-44 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202103377, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202102598, December 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202003034, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 21-24 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201909664, November 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Female, 62 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201909309, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Female, 15-17 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 15-17 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201906062, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 45 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201903638, April 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 41 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201502936, April 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Female, 39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201403590, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint White Male, 49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Instructions
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, April 15, 2016
Penalty: Command Discipline A / Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #200605171, July 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 62 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24201
Closed: 1/15/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully threatened to issue a summons to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case Details:
  1. Wrongful detainment.
  2. Wrongfully arrested an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (8 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Fashakin, Jannet vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV05699, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 31, 2013, ended February 5, 2015
$52,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 19, 2012, plaintiff called the police regarding a break in at 177 Sheffield Avenue, Brooklyn, NY. (On July 10 and 12, 2012, individuals witnessed Kissia Diomande break into a second floor apartment of the building, managed by Ayoola Realty which is owned by plaintiff.) Officers, including Lerte and Hussain, told plaintiff a trespasser has 24 hours to leave the premises, and if Diomande had not left the premises by 6 P.M. on July 20, 2012, to call the police. On July 20, 2012, plaintiff called the police because Diomande had not vacated the apartment. Officers, including McGrath, arrived and told plaintiff he was overruling the officers from the previous day and Diomande would be allowed to stay. On July...

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter
Employment History Summary
IAB Investigation Case: (CC) 2018-890