Ira R. Gibbs

Badge #4086, Black Male
Former Sergeant at Police Service Area 7
Also served at 63rd Precinct, 25th Precinct
Service started March 2000, ended April 2022, Tax #925348

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-19084
Closed: 11/2/2019

View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
12 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Unavailable
5 Complainant Uncooperative
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202004245, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201309410, October 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201204977, April 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201114936, November 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200818001, December 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200402654, March 2004
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200202786, April 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200202083, February 2002
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202004245, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201309410, October 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 31 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201204977, April 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 29 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201114936, November 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200818001, December 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Asian Female, 27 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200402654, March 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 44 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200202786, April 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200202083, February 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-19084
Closed: 11/2/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: On approximately sixteen (16) occasions, wrongfully failed to fulfill his responsibilities as the Patrol Supervisor.
  2. Guilty: On approximately nineteen (19) occasions, wrongfully failed to fulfill his responsibilities as the desk officer.
  3. Guilty: Failed or neglected to make required entries in his activity log.
  4. Guilty: On multiple occasions, wrongfully stayed on duty at his command and worked unnecessary or excessive overtime periods.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Sharpe, Julian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 032704/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 12, 2020