Ryan A. Conroy

Ryan A. Conroy

Ryan A. Conroy
Badge #4764, White Male, 45
Sergeant at Police Service Area 8 since November 2014, active
Also served at 49th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $170,000 last year, Tax #936379

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28615
Closed: 9/16/2023
Case: 2015-14389
Closed: 6/29/2016
Case: 2015-13308
Closed: 6/10/2015

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
17 Allegations
4 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complainant Unavailable
3 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
2 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202309820, October 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202201431, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.75 days)
additional details

Complaint #201706630, July 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201507430, August 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201400254, January 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201016126, November 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202309820, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black, 45-49 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202201431, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Female, 30-34 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.75 days)
additional details
Complaint #201706630, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 14 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201507430, August 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 20 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201400254, January 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 47 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Hispanic Female, 47 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 53 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Other Hispanic Female, 47 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 47 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 7 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201016126, November 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 19 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 19 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 19 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28615
Closed: 9/16/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2015-14389
Closed: 6/29/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to timely notify Internal Affairs of allegations of corruption or other misconduct.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)

Case: 2015-13308
Closed: 6/10/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, entered a location known to the Department without sufficient legal authority
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, used force against a person known to the Department without police necessity
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, detained a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority
Penalty: Vacation days (7 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Freeman, Joseph vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 305565/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 28, 2014
Complaint

Fontanez v. City of New York
Case # 303816/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx
Settlement
Complaint