Jason J. Jansky

Jason J. Jansky

Jason J. Jansky
Lieutenant at Police Service Area 9 since July 2019, active
Also served at 101st Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $221,000 last year, Tax #936807
White Male, 44

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Complaints

5 Complaints
14 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
6 Unsubstantiated
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300456, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #202104835, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Age 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Age 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201304499, May 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, November 2014
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201100169, December 2010
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201007368, May 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202300456, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details
Complaint #202104835, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Age 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Age 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201304499, May 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 28 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, November 2014
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201100169, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201007368, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Walker v. City of New York et al
Case # 15CV03929, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint, First Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was in a vehicle driving on the street where she was forcibly pulled over by defendant officers. Plaintiff was then arrested and detained, charged with disorderly conduct. The charges were dismissed.