Fabio I. Checo

Badge #621, Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 3 at 40th Precinct Detective Squad since May 2017
Also served in: 40th Precinct
Started July 2003, made $133,000 last year, active



Complaints

6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complaint
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

June 2015 - Complaint Details
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Gun pointed
Complainant: Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated

June 2015 - Complaint Details
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Male, 24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse Of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 24 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Male, 24 Unfounded
Force: Gun pointed Male, 24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse Of Authority: Stop Male, 24 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Male, 24 Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD’s own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': The CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2011-6538
Opened: 12/27/2011
Closed: 10/10/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: On one (1) occasion assisted and/or requested the assistance of other members of the service to prevent the processing and adjudication of two (2) summonses issued to various individuals
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. of five (5) (5) to be served on suspension and twenty-five (25) (25)


Lawsuits

Echevarria et al. v. City Of New York, et al.
Case # 306688/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx
2014

Amirazon, Raheem, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 300340/2015, Supreme Court - Bronx
February 6, 2015

Bedford, Eduardo vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 026775/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx
December 28, 2016

Sharpe, Julian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 032704/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx
November 12, 2020