Alfredo Alba

Badge #145, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Strategic Response Group 2 Bronx
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx Task Force
Service started January 2004, ended February 2024, Tax #933598

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Articles

2020 NYC Protests, CCRB, 1/24/2023

Complaints

6 Complaints
17 Allegations
6 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complainant Unavailable
2 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202305193, May 2023
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202201877, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202102795, May 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201013901, October 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201010081, July 2010
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200615469, November 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202305193, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other Black Female, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202201877, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202102795, May 2020
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201013901, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201010081, July 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Handcuffs too tight Hispanic Male, 47 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 47 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200615469, November 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Black Male, 36 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Other Documents