Michael A. Lamastra

Michael A. Lamastra

Michael A. Lamastra
Badge #1745, White Male
Police Officer at Strategic Response Group 2 Bronx since November 2015, active
Also served at 40th Precinct
Service started January 2006, made $127,000 last year, Tax #940354

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-13772
Closed: 12/10/2015

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$27,500   Hart, Sylvia vs City of New York, et al., 2014 BCSC BCSC 304508/2014
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202003879, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: White Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: White Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201209492, July 2012
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201001741, February 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202003879, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) White Female, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Gender White Female, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201209492, July 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Hispanic Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 18 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201001741, February 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 22 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-13772
Closed: 12/10/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to request the response of a Patrol Supervisor
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to enter details in said officer's activity log and failed to prepare an aided report worksheet for an emotionally distrubed person, as required
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Lawsuits

Hart, Sylvia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 304508/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 27, 2014, ended October 4, 2018
$27,500 Settlement

Other Documents